XM vs Sirius, The War Begins

Business wars are great and to add to the Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo war, Sirius and XM satellite radio are going at it too. Last week Sirius announced that they have surpassed 3 million subscribers. Something that XM did back almost a year ago in December of 2004. However, Sirius had the help from a well know guy named Howard Stern who is now officially working for Sirius as of Jan 1 2006. Therefore, what makes one better form the other? I have put together a chart to help differentiate the two.

Sirius XM
Satellites 3 2
Monthly Cost $12.95 No Contract 12.95 No Contract
Activation $15.00 online activation available $14.99 online activation available
Sports NFL, NBA, NHL, College Sports, English Soccer, Horse Racing. (NHL to be on XM for 07-08 season) NASCAR, PGA, MLB, COLLEGE SPORTS
Hardware Sirius Radios XM Radios
Online listening Yes Yes
Commercial Free 65 Channels 67 Channels
Channels Over 120 digital 160 digital
Availability US and Canada US and Canada
Customer service 24 hrs Mon – Sat: 6AM – 2 AM ET Sun: 8 AM – 8 PM ET

The war is going to be good. Currently they are mostly the same package, although Sirius is boasting more channels that people like such as sports and Stern. We will have to wait and see who will win this battle. Although its already started. The Washington Post is reporting XM has reached a deal that will allow there radios to work with voice commands. This will be interesting since it’s all about who can get the most customers.

Microsoft Warns of a New Flaw

Microsoft Security FlawAnother major security flaw in the pipeline for Microsoft. The Washington Post is reporting that this one could be big. It’s more of the same stuff, a hole in windows that allows spoffers to install spyware and other code to take control and spy. However, this one may allow attackers to gain financial information from bank websites, emails, and e-commerce sites simply by you visiting them. Microsoft warns users not to click links, open attachments of visit unfamiliar websites till the flaw is fixed. It is known that some code can be installed through banner ads on websites. Be Careful!

Security researchers revealed the flaw on Tuesday and posted instructions online that showed how would-be attackers could exploit the flaw. Within hours, computer virus and spyware authors were using the flaw to distribute malicious programs that could allow them to take over and remotely control afflicted computers.

Microsoft’s statement about how the would-be attackers could exploit the flaw brings back many questions about open source technology and if Microsoft keep quite about flaws in there OS till they have a fix for them. In the past Microsoft used to not mention there holes in the OS till they had a fix but since a flurry of complaints that they should revile them right away they have been doing just that. This brings up the question now of, should they revel them or not? I mean come on, the average computer user (home user) isn’t going to patch there machine till the little window pops up and says they have updates to install. Microsoft now posted the flaw and how to use it. This is just plain dumb. What do you think? Should Microsoft post there flaws when they find out about them or should they keep it to themselves till they have a fix?