<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kapusta Brothers &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kapustabrothers.com/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com</link>
	<description>Come and read the thoughts about everything and anything from politics to web development.  Shaun Farrell has been the founder and creator of kapustabrothers.com since it was registered some time ago.  As a web developer, and programmer Shaun brings thought to his posts had takes a stance on a lot of issues.  Come and read his thoughts and comments of others.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Warns Users to Malware</title>
		<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2007/01/11/google-warns-users-to-malware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2007/01/11/google-warns-users-to-malware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>farrelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2007/01/11/google-warns-users-to-malware/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today while searching Google for a PHP Events Calendar to use on doswfl.com I ran into a Malware Warning brought to me by Google.  I haven&#8217;t seen this before from Google.  Is this new?  If so it&#8217;s a great idea!  This could possible cut down on the number of windows viruses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today while searching Google for a PHP Events Calendar to use on <a title="SWFL News" href="http://www.doswfl.com/">doswfl.com</a> I ran into a <a title="Maleware Warning" href="http://www.google.com/interstitial?url=http://www.softcomplex.com/products/php_event_calendar/">Malware Warning</a> brought to me by <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a>.  I haven&#8217;t seen this before from Google.  Is this new?  If so it&#8217;s a great idea!  This could possible cut down on the number of windows viruses simple by warning users and making it harder for them to get to a site known to have embeded <a title="Malware" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malware">Malware</a>.  Take a look at this screenshot</p>
<p><a class="imagelink" title="Google Advisory" href="http://www.kapustabrothers.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/googleerror.JPG"></a><a class="imagelink" title="Google Advisory" href="http://www.kapustabrothers.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/googleerror.JPG"><img id="image310" src="http://www.kapustabrothers.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/googleerror.thumbnail.JPG" border="0" alt="Google Advisory" /></a><br />
I would have to say thanks to Google for protecting users!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2007/01/11/google-warns-users-to-malware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE7 Push</title>
		<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/12/06/ie7-push/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/12/06/ie7-push/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>farrelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/12/06/ie7-push/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not sure if anyone has noticed but today when I logged on to my computer the little bubble popped up and said you need to install your updates.  This is what I saw

I haven&#8217;t decided if I should or not so it&#8217;s still sitting in my task manager tray.  Has anyone else installed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if anyone has noticed but today when I logged on to my computer the little bubble popped up and said you need to install your updates.  This is what I saw</p>
<p><img id="image296" src="http://www.kapustabrothers.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/ie7update.JPG" alt="IE 7 Update" /></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t decided if I should or not so it&#8217;s still sitting in my task manager tray.  Has anyone else installed this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/12/06/ie7-push/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE7 Today?</title>
		<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/10/19/ie7-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/10/19/ie7-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>farrelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/10/19/ie7-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a windows computer and have you windows update install updates automatically you may want to be aware that IE7 will be pushed today. Internet Explorer 7 is much different that current editions and you will see a significant difference. Many sources are reporting that this will be pushed today!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="IE 7" src="http://static.flickr.com/25/95743846_b6b4f527e2_s.jpg" alt="IE 7" hspace="5" align="left" />If you have a windows computer and have you windows update install updates automatically you may want to be aware that IE7 will be pushed today. Internet Explorer 7 is much different that current editions and you will see a significant difference. Many sources are reporting that this will be pushed today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/10/19/ie7-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple seizes the word “Podcast”</title>
		<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/09/26/apple-seizes-the-word-%e2%80%9cpodcast%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/09/26/apple-seizes-the-word-%e2%80%9cpodcast%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>farrelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/09/26/apple-seizes-the-word-%e2%80%9cpodcast%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has sent out cease and desist letters to podcasters for using the word podcast.  Is Apple going to ruin it for everyone because of there marketing and legal gimmicks?  I think it’s funny that Apple has gone this route.  Podcasting has made the iPod a very nice investment and now with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><img title="microphone" src="http://static.flickr.com/80/234793088_132af66d4e_s.jpg" alt="microphone" hspace="5" align="left" /><a title="apple" href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/apple-claims-trademark-infringement-on-podcast/">Apple has sent out cease and desist letters</a> to podcasters for using the word <a title="apple" href="http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/09/23/will-apple-sue-podtechnet-my-employer/">podcast</a>.  Is Apple going to ruin it for everyone because of there marketing and legal gimmicks?  I think it’s funny that <a title="apple" href="http://atp.datagate.net.uk/blog/?p=691">Apple </a>has gone this route.  Podcasting has made the iPod a very nice <a title="zune" href="http://www.gadgetell.com/2006/09/zune-and-ipod-get-compared/">investment </a>and now with the Zune player coming out Apple needed to do something.  The common internet users think that you need an iPod to listen to podcasts which you don’t.  With the release of the <a title="zune" href="http://www.zuneinsider.com/2006/09/the_cool_zune_k.html">Zune player</a> Microsoft may market it as the next generation podcast listener.  Not what apple would like!  I think this is why Apple is doing what they are doing.  Bad choice by Apple since the internet and podcasting community will have to come up with another name.  The word podcast has become a internet recognized name.  However, things may have to start from scratch again.  So what would you like the new <a title="apple" href="http://www.unmajestic.com/permalink.asp?0162f20874b19cac736b6ea0dc095812">podcast </a>word to be?  What about MAUDcast = Mobile Audio Casting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/09/26/apple-seizes-the-word-%e2%80%9cpodcast%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft To Give Money to NYer&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/03/16/microsoft-to-give-money-to-nyers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/03/16/microsoft-to-give-money-to-nyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>farrelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Odds & Ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/03/16/microsoft-to-give-money-to-nyers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For your information if you haven&#8217;t heard and you live in the great state of New York, you may be eligible for some money.  If you purchased any Microsoft software since May of 1994 you can get some money.  If you interested check out this article in the New York Daily or check out the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="money" src="http://static.flickr.com/36/112971106_e43acc129f_s.jpg" alt="money" hspace="5" align="left" />For your information if you haven&#8217;t heard and you live in the great state of New York, you may be eligible for some money.  If you purchased any Microsoft software since May of 1994 you can get some money.  If you interested check out this article in the <a title="NY Daily" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/business/story/400075p-338939c.html">New York Daily</a> or check out the <a href="http://www.microsoftnysettlement.com/">Class Action Law Suit</a> page.  Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/03/16/microsoft-to-give-money-to-nyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office Live Giveaway</title>
		<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/02/20/office-live-giveaway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/02/20/office-live-giveaway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>farrelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Odds & Ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/02/20/office-live-giveaway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have one Microsoft Live Beta testing account.  I&#8217;m willing to barter. Any takers?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="Office Live" src="http://static.flickr.com/29/99674857_e5e0766b03_s.jpg" alt="Office Live" hspace="5" align="left" />I have one Microsoft Live Beta testing account.  I&#8217;m willing to barter. Any takers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/02/20/office-live-giveaway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XM vs Sirius, The War Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/01/02/xm-vs-sirius-the-war-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/01/02/xm-vs-sirius-the-war-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>farrelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Odds & Ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satellite Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sirius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kapustabrothers.com/journal/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Business wars are great and to add to the Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo war, Sirius and XM satellite radio are going at it too. Last week Sirius announced that they have surpassed 3 million subscribers. Something that XM did back almost a year ago in December of 2004. However, Sirius had the help from a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business wars are great and to add to the <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a>, <a title="Microsoft" href="http://www.microsoft.com/">Microsoft</a>, and <a title="yahoo" href="http://www.yahoo.com/">Yahoo </a>war, <a title="Sirius" href="http://www.sirius.com/">Sirius </a>and <a title="XM" href="http://www.xmradio.com/">XM</a> satellite radio are going at it too. Last week Sirius announced that they have surpassed 3 million subscribers. Something that XM did back almost a year ago in December of 2004. However, Sirius had the help from a well know guy named <a title="Stern" href="http://www.howardstern.com/">Howard Stern</a> who is now officially working for Sirius as of Jan 1 2006. Therefore, what makes one better form the other? I have put together a chart to help differentiate the two.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong> </strong></td>
<td><strong>Sirius</strong></td>
<td><strong>XM</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Satellites</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://www.cashflowbusiness.net/siri_orbit.htm">3</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.cashflowbusiness.net/siri_orbit.htm">2</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Monthly Cost</strong></td>
<td>$12.95 No Contract</td>
<td>12.95 No Contract</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Activation</strong></td>
<td>$15.00 online activation available</td>
<td>$14.99 online activation available</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sports</strong></td>
<td>NFL, NBA, NHL, College Sports, English Soccer, Horse Racing. (NHL to be on XM for 07-08 season)</td>
<td>NASCAR, PGA, MLB, COLLEGE SPORTS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Hardware</strong></td>
<td><a title="Sirius Radios" href="http://shop.sirius.com/">Sirius Radios</a></td>
<td><a title="XM Radios" href="http://xmradio.com/get_xm/index.jsp">XM Radios</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Online listening</strong></td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Commercial Free</strong></td>
<td>65 Channels</td>
<td>67 Channels</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Channels</strong></td>
<td>Over 120 digital</td>
<td>160 digital</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Availability</strong></td>
<td>US and Canada</td>
<td>US and Canada</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Customer service</strong></td>
<td>24 hrs</td>
<td>Mon &#8211; Sat: 6AM &#8211; 2 AM ET Sun: 8 AM &#8211; 8 PM ET</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The war is going to be good. Currently they are mostly the same package, although Sirius is boasting more channels that people like such as sports and Stern. We will have to wait and see who will win this battle. Although its already started. The <a title="Washington Post" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/">Washington Post</a> is reporting <a title="XM on the Post" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/29/AR2005122901434.html">XM has reached a deal that will allow there radios to work with voice commands</a>. This will be interesting since it&#8217;s all about who can get the most customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2006/01/02/xm-vs-sirius-the-war-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Warns of a New Flaw</title>
		<link>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2005/12/30/microsoft-warns-of-a-new-flaw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2005/12/30/microsoft-warns-of-a-new-flaw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>farrelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Flaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kapustabrothers.com/journal/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another major security flaw in the pipeline for Microsoft.  The Washington Post is reporting that this one could be big.  It’s more of the same stuff, a hole in windows that allows spoffers to install spyware and other code to take control and spy.  However, this one may allow attackers to gain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><img title="Microsoft Security Flaw" src="http://static.flickr.com/21/25703494_b90a60931b_s.jpg" alt="Microsoft Security Flaw" hspace="5" align="left" />Another major security flaw in the pipeline for <a title="Microsoft" href="http://www.microsoft.com/">Microsoft</a>.  The <a title="Washington Post" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/29/AR2005122901456.html">Washington Post</a> is reporting that this one could be big.  It’s more of the same stuff, a hole in windows that allows spoffers to install spyware and other code to take control and spy.  However, this one may allow attackers to gain financial information from bank websites, emails, and e-commerce sites simply by you visiting them.  Microsoft warns users not to click links, open attachments of visit unfamiliar websites till the flaw is fixed.  It is known that some code can be installed through banner ads on websites.  Be Careful!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<blockquote><p>Security researchers revealed the flaw on Tuesday and posted instructions online that showed how would-be attackers could exploit the flaw. Within hours, computer virus and spyware authors were using the flaw to distribute malicious programs that could allow them to take over and remotely control afflicted computers.</p></blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">Microsoft’s statement about how the would-be attackers could exploit the flaw brings back many questions about open source technology and if Microsoft keep quite about flaws in there OS till they have a fix for them.  In the past Microsoft used to not mention there holes in the OS till they had a fix but since a flurry of complaints that they should revile them right away they have been doing just that.  This brings up the question now of, should they revel them or not?  I mean come on, the average computer user (home user) isn’t going to patch there machine till the little window pops up and says they have updates to install.  Microsoft now posted the flaw and how to use it. This is just plain dumb.  What do you think?  Should Microsoft post there flaws when they find out about them or should they keep it to themselves till they have a fix?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kapustabrothers.com/2005/12/30/microsoft-warns-of-a-new-flaw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
